ANALISIS CLUSTERING PROYEK RENOVASIA 2025
Pattern Recognition untuk Optimasi Operasional & Profitabilitas
Version: 1.0
Tanggal: 26 Januari 2026
Tujuan: Menganalisis 28 proyek untuk identifikasi clustering pattern sebagai decision-making framework
Scope: Timeline ideal, efisiensi operasional, komposisi biaya optimal, risk assessment
📊 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Dokumen ini menganalisis 28 proyek dengan data RAB tersedia untuk mengidentifikasi clustering pattern yang dapat digunakan sebagai decision-making framework dalam: - Timeline ideal berdasarkan nilai RAB - Efisiensi operasional berdasarkan cluster lokasi - Komposisi biaya optimal untuk maximum margin - Risk assessment berdasarkan karakteristik proyek
KEY FINDINGS: - 22 dari 28 proyek dengan data lengkap mencapai margin proyek rata-rata 64% (gross margin per proyek) - Margin netto perusahaan setelah alokasi HO: ~19-22% dari revenue bulanan - Cluster lokasi Sawangan-Cimanggis-Depok menunjukkan efisiensi operasional tertinggi - Sweet spot nilai RAB: Rp 200-600 juta dengan timeline optimal 3-6 bulan - Project size 60-80m² paling efisien untuk maximize margin per m²
[!NOTE]
BREAKDOWN MARGIN BULANAN
Revenue Rp 540 juta/bulan:
Komponen Nilai Keterangan Mix Proyek Running Contoh bulan tipikal - 1 proyek Bracket D Rp 463jt timeline 6 bulan - 2 proyek Bracket C Rp 332jt + Rp 311jt timeline 5 bulan - 1 proyek Bracket B Rp 216jt timeline 4 bulan Kontribusi Gross Profit Bulan Ini - Bracket D Rp 52.5 jt Rp 315jt ÷ 6 bulan - Bracket C1 Rp 41.2 jt Rp 206jt ÷ 5 bulan - Bracket C2 Rp 48.6 jt Rp 243jt ÷ 5 bulan - Bracket B Rp 33.0 jt Rp 132jt ÷ 4 bulan Total Kontribusi Rp 175.3 juta/bulan Fix Cost HO -Rp 72.0 juta/bulan Margin Netto Bulan Rp 103.3 juta 19.1% dari revenue [!NOTE]
Catatan Penting
Margin proyek 64% adalah gross PER PROYEK. Margin netto 19% adalah net BULANAN setelah:
- Gross profit proyek dibagi timeline (5-6 bulan)
- Multiple proyek paralel dijumlah kontribusinya
- Fix Cost HO Rp 72jt dikurangi setiap bulan
Detail lengkap per cluster: lihat dokumen 10-MARGIN_BREAKDOWN_PER_CLUSTER_DETAIL.md
💰 1. CLUSTERING BERDASARKAN NILAI RAB & TIMELINE
1.1 BRACKET A: MICRO PROJECT (< Rp 100 Juta)
Timeline Ideal: 1-3 bulan
Karakteristik: Renovasi partial, pekerjaan khusus, scope terbatas
| No | Proyek | Lokasi | RAB | Scope | Timeline Estimasi |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pak Muhdi - Jagakarsa | Jakarta Selatan | 34.5 jt | Waterproofing & toilet | 1-2 bulan |
| 2 | Optik Jinan | Depok | 20.7 jt | Interior kabinet | 0.5-1 bulan |
Pattern: - Mobilisasi: Rp 1-3 juta (5-15% dari RAB) - Support tools: Minimal, fokus specialized tools - Revenue potential: Low volume, high frequency opportunity - Margin expectation: 40-60% (biaya overhead rendah tapi tidak ada skala ekonomi)
REKOMENDASI: ✅ Oke untuk: - Fill gap timeline antara proyek besar - Maintain relationship dengan existing client - Generate quick cashflow
❌ Hindari: - Lokasi jauh (>15km dari base) → biaya mobilisasi tidak sebanding - Scope yang terlalu custom/khusus → risk tidak terkontrol - Multiple site micro project dalam waktu bersamaan → fragmentasi tim
ACTION: - Harga minimum mobilisasi: Rp 2.5 juta - Lokasi maksimal radius: 12km dari Depok base - Bundle dengan maintenance contract jika memungkinkan
1.2 BRACKET B: SMALL PROJECT (Rp 100-250 Juta)
Timeline Ideal: 2.5-4 bulan
Karakteristik: Renovasi medium, rumah kecil (40-70m²)
| No | Proyek | Lokasi | RAB | Luas | Harga/m² | Status 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pak Purwoko - Banjaran | Banjaran | 160 jt | 60m² | 2.7 jt/m² | ✅ Profit 60% |
| 2 | Pak Warga - Sawangan Lama | Sawangan | 176.9 jt | 63m² | 2.8 jt/m² | ✅ Profit 67% |
| 3 | Bu Titik - Jatijajar | Depok | 215.6 jt | 71m² | 3.0 jt/m² | ✅ Profit 61% |
| 4 | Pak Warga - Sawangan Baru | Sawangan | 221.3 jt | 60m² | 3.7 jt/m² | ✅ Profit 57% |
Pattern Yang Konsisten: - Mobilisasi: Rp 2-6 juta (2-4%) - Persiapan & Bongkaran: 7.6-10.1% - Beton struktur: 11-22% (variation tergantung bertingkat atau tidak) - Atap: 8.3-24.7% (huge variation, rata-rata 12%) - Margin Proyek (Gross): 57-67% dari revenue proyek (sebelum biaya HO)
MARGIN BREAKDOWN BRACKET B (Contoh Bu Titik Rp 216 juta):
| Komponen | Nilai | Persentase |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue proyek | Rp 216 juta | 100% |
| Biaya proyek | Rp 84 juta | 39% |
| Margin Proyek (Gross) | Rp 132 juta | 61% dari revenue |
| Timeline | 4 bulan | |
| Kontribusi per bulan | Rp 33 juta/bulan | Rp 132jt ÷ 4 |
Jika running dengan 3 proyek paralel (mix B+C):
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Total kontribusi | Rp 99-120 juta/bulan |
| Fix Cost HO | Rp 72 juta/bulan |
| Surplus | Rp 27-48 juta/bulan ✅ |
Alokasi HO untuk proyek ini (fair share 3 proyek):
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Gross profit | Rp 132 juta |
| HO allocation (Rp 72jt × 4 bulan ÷ 3) | Rp 96 juta |
| Margin Netto | Rp 36 juta (16.7% dari revenue) |
[!NOTE]
Catatan
Margin netto 16.7% adalah untuk PROYEK ini setelah fair share HO. Di level perusahaan dengan mix optimal, margin netto agregat ~19-22%.
[!TIP]
SWEET SPOT
Luas optimal: 60-71 m²
Harga/m²: Rp 2.7-3.7 juta
Total RAB: Rp 160-220 juta
Timeline: 3-4 bulan
Expected margin: 60-65%
REKOMENDASI: ✅ Perfect untuk: - Core business model Renovasia - Predictable cost structure - Manageable dengan 1 tim (4-6 tukang + mandor) - Cash flow cycle yang sehat
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS: 1. Lokasi cluster (radius 5-8km dari existing project) 2. Standardisasi RAB composition - Persiapan: 7-10% - Struktur (pondasi + beton): 18-25% - Finishing (keramik + cat + kusen): 30-35% - ME (listrik + air): 6-9% 3. Timeline discipline: Maksimal 4 bulan, jangan extend!
ACTION: - Template RAB untuk bracket ini sudah solid ✅ - Target: 60% minimum margin - Jika margin prediction < 55%, tinjau ulang scope atau decline - Timeline buffer: +0.5 bulan untuk handling cuaca/unforeseen
1.3 BRACKET C: MEDIUM PROJECT (Rp 250-450 Juta)
Timeline Ideal: 4-6 bulan
Karakteristik: Rumah 2 lantai, luas 70-120m², full construction/major renovation
| No | Proyek | Lokasi | RAB | Luas | Harga/m² | Revenue 2025 | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bu Sella - Citeureup | Bogor | 267.5 jt | 78m² | 3.4 jt/m² | 267 jt | 55% |
| 2 | Pak Raihan - Cibitung | Bekasi | 310.8 jt | 105m² | 3.0 jt/m² | 311 jt | 78% ⭐ |
| 3 | Pak Ardy - Cilodong | Depok | 327.7 jt | 98m² | 3.3 jt/m² | 328 jt | 59% |
| 4 | Pak Bangkit - Sawangan | Depok | 332.4 jt | 100m² | 3.3 jt/m² | 332 jt | 62% |
| 5 | Bu Sarah - Ciracas | Jakarta | 350 jt | 120m² | 2.9 jt/m² | 350 jt | 67% |
| 6 | Pak Abdul Kohir - Beji | Depok | 388.4 jt | 120m² | 3.2 jt/m² | 388 jt | 59% |
Pattern Analysis: - Mobilisasi: Rp 4-8 juta (1.5-2.5%) - Support tools: Rp 2-5 juta (lebih complex, perlu scaffolding, etc) - Persiapan total: 8-13% dari RAB - Margin range: 55-78% (average 63%) - Outlier: Pak Raihan 78% margin → Best practice case study!
[!IMPORTANT]
GOLD STANDARD
Pak Raihan - Cibitung: Kenapa margin 78%?
- RAB 310.8 jt, Revenue 311 jt (on budget ✅)
- Lokasi: Bekasi (bukan cluster utama tapi manageable)
- Luas 105m² → efficient size
- Hypothesis: Efisiensi material procurement + timeline execution sempurna
CHALLENGES DI BRACKET INI: - Timeline creep risk → jika melewati 6 bulan, overhead membengkak - Material price volatility impact lebih besar - Client change order risk meningkat - Perlu 1.5-2 tim atau phasing yang baik
REKOMENDASI: ✅ Target segment utama karena: - Revenue per project cukup significant (Rp 250-450 juta) - Margin masih excellent (rata-rata 63%) - Manageable complexity
CRITICAL CONTROL POINTS: 1. Timeline maksimal 6 bulan → beyond this, margin eroded by overhead 2. Lokasi preference: - Tier 1: Depok, Sawangan, Cimanggis (cluster utama) - Tier 2: Bekasi, Bogor, Jakarta Timur (radius 20km) - Avoid: Beyond 25km one-way 3. Material procurement strategy: - Bulk order untuk 2-3 project sekaligus (leverage volume discount) - Partnership dengan supplier untuk payment terms 4. Phasing strategy: - Month 1-2: Struktur & rangka - Month 3-4: Dinding & atap - Month 5-6: Finishing
ACTION: - Buat project template Pak Raihan sebagai benchmark - Analisa detail: kenapa bisa 78% margin → replikasi formula ini - Timeline SOP: 4.5 bulan standard, max 6 bulan - Jika predict > 6 bulan, naikan RAB 15-20% atau decline
1.4 BRACKET D: LARGE PROJECT (Rp 450-700 Juta)
Timeline Ideal: 5-8 bulan
Karakteristik: 2-3 lantai, luas >120m², premium spec
| No | Proyek | Lokasi | RAB | Luas | Harga/m² | Revenue 2025 | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pak Firman - Cinere | Depok | 463.2 jt | 140m² | 3.3 jt/m² | 463 jt | 68% |
| 2 | Bu Retno - Tambun | Bekasi | 486.6 jt | 150m² | 3.2 jt/m² | 487 jt | 70% ⭐ |
| 3 | Pak Andre - Permata H3 | Cimanggis | 499 jt | 139m² | 3.6 jt/m² | 499 jt | 64% |
| 4 | Pak Yulan - Permata H2 | Cimanggis | 578.4 jt | 175m² | 3.3 jt/m² | 578 jt | 69% |
| 5 | Pak Rony - Permata Cimanggis | Cimanggis | 667.7 jt | 200m² | 3.3 jt/m² | 668 jt | 71% ⭐ |
Pattern Yang Menarik: - Margin tetap solid: 64-71% (average 68%) - Harga/m² range sempit: Rp 3.2-3.6 juta (standardisasi bagus!) - Cluster lokasi: 3 dari 5 di Cimanggis (operational efficiency!) - Mobilisasi: Rp 5-10 juta (1-2% dari RAB)
TOP PERFORMERS: 1. Bu Retno - Tambun: 70% margin, 150m², Bekasi 2. Pak Rony - Permata: 71% margin, 200m², Cimanggis
SUCCESS PATTERN: - Lokasi di existing cluster (operational cost sharing) - Size 150-200m² (optimal untuk 2 tim parallel work) - Spec standardized (tidak terlalu custom) - Timeline execution within 6-7 bulan
CHALLENGES: - Butuh 2 full team atau phasing sangat baik - Cash flow cycle lebih panjang (5-8 bulan) - Material procurement volume besar → perlu vendor relationship solid - Change order risk tinggi (client premium biasanya lebih demanding)
REKOMENDASI: ✅ High value target karena: - Revenue significant per project - Margin masih sangat baik (68%) - Brandlift untuk portfolio (rumah premium)
STRATEGIC REQUIREMENTS: 1. Cash flow buffer: - Minimum WIP (Work in Progress) financing: Rp 150 juta - Termin payment schedule ketat: 30%-40%-30% (uang muka-progress-selesai) 2. Team capability: - Perlu mandor senior dengan track record - 2 tim parallel atau phasing master plan yang detail 3. Lokasi clustering: - Priority: Cimanggis, Sawangan, Depok (proven cluster) - Accept with premium: Bekasi, Bogor (naikan RAB 10%) - Risky: BSD, Tangerang (overhead tinggi → naikan RAB 20% atau decline)
ACTION: - Maximum concurrent large projects: 2 unit (avoid over-stretch) - Payment terms: 30% DP minimum (non-negotiable untuk bracket ini) - Timeline SOP: 6-7 bulan, buffer +1 bulan for premium spec adjustment - Material bulk procurement: Coordinate dengan medium project untuk leverage
1.5 BRACKET E: PREMIUM PROJECT (> Rp 700 Juta)
Timeline Ideal: 7-10 bulan
Karakteristik: >200m², premium/luxury spec, multiple floor
| No | Proyek | Lokasi | RAB | Luas | Harga/m² | Revenue 2025 | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bu Tinah - Puspitek | Tangerang | 786 jt | 221m² | 3.6 jt/m² | 786 jt | 71% ⭐⭐ |
| 2 | Bu Hanny - GTP C15 | Depok | 854 jt | 240m² | 3.6 jt/m² | 854 jt | 68% ⭐ |
| 3 | PT Soewarna - Bandara | Tangerang | 1.08 M | 320m² | 3.4 jt/m² | 1.08 M | 59% |
[!IMPORTANT]
GOLD STANDARD
Bu Tinah - Puspitek: 71% margin pada project Rp 786 juta!
- Lokasi: Tangerang (outside main cluster)
- Size: 221m²
- Execution excellent → template untuk premium project
Pattern Premium: - Margin range: 59-71% (average 66%) - Price/m²: Rp 3.4-3.6 juta (surprisingly consistent!) - Mobilisasi: Rp 8-15 juta - Timeline: 7-10 bulan
UNIQUE CHARACTERISTICS: - Scope clarity critical → ambiguitas = disaster - Client expectation management jadi kunci - Quality control harus ketat (premium = zero tolerance untuk rework) - Specialized subcon needed (elevator, smart home, etc)
CASE STUDY: PT Soewarna 59% Margin
Margin paling rendah di premium bracket, kenapa? - Lokasi: Bandara (far from base) - Luas: 320m² (sangat besar, kompleksitas tinggi) - Commercial project (different standard dari residential) - Lesson: Commercial premium ≠ residential premium dalam margin expectation
REKOMENDASI: ⚠️ Selective approach karena: - High revenue BUT also high risk - Cash flow intensive (need strong financial buffer) - Reputation impact besar (success = brandlift, failure = reputational damage)
ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA: 1. Client financial stability verified (bukan cash flow spekulasi) 2. Lokasi: - Ideal: Depok, Cimanggis cluster (proven ground) - Accept with premium: Tangerang, BSD (proven Bu Tinah case) - Risky: Beyond 30km, or new territory 3. Downpayment: 40% minimum (Rp 300+ juta for >700 jt project) 4. Team readiness: - Dedicated project manager - 2-3 teams atau phasing ultra-detail - QC supervisor dedicated 5. Timeline buffer: +2 months dari standard (untuk handling premium spec details)
FINANCIAL REQUIREMENTS: - WIP financing: Rp 250-400 juta - Material credit line: Rp 150 juta - Emergency fund: Rp 50 juta (untuk unforeseen premium material/rework)
ACTION: - Maximum concurrent: 1 premium project only - Tidak boleh overlap dengan >2 large project - Contract must include: penalty clause untuk delay client decision - Contingency budget: 8-10% dari RAB
📍 2. CLUSTERING BERDASARKAN LOKASI & EFISIENSI OPERASIONAL
2.1 CLUSTER ZONA 1: DEPOK-SAWANGAN-CIMANGGIS (Core Territory)
Radius: 5-12km dari base
Total Project 2025: 14 proyek
Performance: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
| Lokasi Detail | Proyek | Total RAB | Avg Margin | Operational Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sawangan | 3 proyek | 731 jt | 62% | Lowest |
| Cimanggis | 5 proyek | 2.81 M | 67% | Lowest |
| Depok (Beji, Cilodong, dll) | 6 proyek | 1.79 M | 64% | Very Low |
WHY THIS IS GOLDEN CLUSTER:
1. Mobilisasi & Logistik Efficiency - Jarak tempuh: 20-40 menit one way - Bisa multi-project daily visit (1 mandor handle 2 sites) - Material delivery: same-day possible - Emergency response: <1 jam
2. Vendor Ecosystem - Toko material within cluster (diskon volume + credit terms) - Tukang lokal pool available (reduce mobilisasi cost) - Equipment rental nearby
3. Operational Cost Breakdown:
| Item | Zona 1 | vs Zona 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Transport harian | 20-40k/hari | 100-150k/hari |
| Material delivery | Free-50k | 150-300k |
| Mandor site visit | 1 trip = multi site | 1 trip = 1 site |
| Emergency response | <100k | 200-500k |
| Total overhead saving | Baseline | +15-25% |
SUCCESS METRICS: - Margin average: 64% - Timeline adherence: 90% on-time - Client satisfaction: 95% (proximity = responsive)
STRATEGY: ✅ PRIORITY ZONE untuk semua bracket project ✅ Marketing focus: Referral network di zona ini ✅ Brand presence: Billboard/signage di proyek aktif ✅ Vendor relationship: Negotiate annual contract untuk volume
ACTION: - Maintain minimum 60% project dari zona ini - Jika ada project dari zona lain, harus premium pricing (10-20% markup) - Tukang recruitment: prioritas zona ini (reduce mobilisasi)
2.2 CLUSTER ZONA 2: BEKASI-BOGOR-JAKARTA TIMUR (Extended Territory)
Radius: 15-25km dari base
Total Project 2025: 8 proyek
Performance: ⭐⭐⭐⭐
| Lokasi Detail | Proyek | Total RAB | Avg Margin | Operational Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bekasi (Cibitung, Tambun) | 3 proyek | 1.28 M | 68% ⭐ | Moderate |
| Bogor (Citeureup) | 2 proyek | 535 jt | 55% | Moderate-High |
| Jakarta Timur (Ciracas, dll) | 3 proyek | 735 jt | 64% | Moderate |
INTERESTING FINDING: Bekasi margin 68% → lebih tinggi dari Zona 1 (64%)!
Root Cause Analysis: 1. Project size: 2 dari 3 adalah large/premium (Pak Raihan 310jt, Bu Retno 486jt) 2. Client profile: Less demanding, trust builder 3. Competition: Kurang intense, bisa maintain pricing 4. Efficiency: Meski jauh, tapi karena project size besar → economies of scale
Zona 2 Operational Cost: - Transport: Rp 60-100k/hari (1.5 jam one way) - Material delivery: Rp 100-200k per trip - Mandor visit: Dedicated per site (tidak bisa multi-site) - Overhead: +10-15% vs Zona 1
CHALLENGES: - Traffic unpredictability (Bekasi toll, Bogor macet) - Material procurement: Harus coordinate advance (tidak bisa same-day) - Emergency handling: 1.5-2 jam response time - Quality control: Visit mandor 2-3x/week instead of daily
PROFITABLE CONDITION: ✅ Project value: Minimum Rp 250 juta ✅ Timeline: Well-planned phasing (minimize back-and-forth) ✅ Material: Bulk delivery scheduled weekly ✅ Pricing: +10% markup dari Zona 1 equivalent
STRATEGY: - Selective acceptance → prioritize large/premium bracket - Reject micro/small project di zona ini (margin akan destroyed oleh overhead) - Cluster approach: Jika ada 2-3 project in same sub-area (e.g., Cibitung), consider parallel execution untuk efficiency
ACTION: - Pricing rule: Zona 2 = Zona 1 + 10% - Minimum project size: Rp 250 juta - Timeline: Must have +0.5 month buffer - Material strategy: Weekly bulk delivery, eliminate ad-hoc trips
2.3 CLUSTER ZONA 3: TANGERANG-BSD-JAKARTA BARAT (Premium Territory)
Radius: 25-40km dari base
Total Project 2025: 6 proyek
Performance: ⭐⭐⭐
| Lokasi Detail | Proyek | Total RAB | Avg Margin | Operational Cost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tangerang (Puspitek, Bandara) | 2 proyek | 1.86 M | 65% | High |
| BSD/Serpong | 3 proyek | 945 jt | 48% ⚠️ | Very High |
| Jakarta Barat | 1 proyek | 250 jt | 52% | High |
RED FLAGS
BSD Margin Problem!
48% average margin → terendah dari semua cluster!
BSD Projects Deep Dive: - Bu Raras - Cimanggis: -34% loss ❌ (DISASTER!) - Pak Andy - BSD Exterior: Margin unknown (data belum complete) - Project lain: ~50% margin
Root Cause - BSD Challenges: 1. Operational Cost Explosion: - Transport: Rp 150-200k/hari (2+ jam one way, toll, parkir) - Material delivery: Rp 300-500k (vendor jarang mau ke sana, atau charge premium) - Mandor: Lost time 4-5 jam/day for commute 2. Client Profile: - High expectation (premium area = premium expectation) - Detail-oriented (more change orders) - Payment kadang negotiated (leverage power) 3. Competition: - Banyak kontraktor lokal dengan overhead lebih rendah - Price pressure 4. Vendor Ecosystem: - Material source jauh (harus beli dari Depok/Bekasi lalu kirim) - No local tukang pool (harus bawa team penuh dari Depok)
SUCCESSFUL CASE: Bu Tinah - Puspitek
71% margin despite di Tangerang! How? - Project size: Rp 786 juta (premium bracket) - Pricing: Properly calculated overhead (estimate naik 20%) - Execution: Timeline discipline, minimal rework - Client: Clear scope, decisive, payment on time
LESSON LEARNED: Zona 3 hanya profitable jika: 1. Project size: Minimum Rp 400 juta (untuk absorb overhead) 2. Pricing: +20-25% markup dari Zona 1 3. Client: Financially stable + clear scope 4. Timeline: Buffer +1 month untuk handling logistik
STRATEGY: ⚠️ HIGH SELECTIVITY required - Default answer: "Decline with referral" kecuali conditions terpenuhi - Accept only: Large/Premium bracket dengan proper pricing
ACCEPTANCE CHECKLIST: - [ ] Project value > Rp 400 juta - [ ] Client DP 40%+ ready - [ ] Scope ultra-clear (no ambiguity) - [ ] RAB calculation: Zona 1 + 20-25% - [ ] Timeline: +1 month buffer - [ ] No concurrent project di Zona 3 lain
ACTION: - Marketing: Soft-stop marketing effort di Zona 3 - Referral network: Build relationship dengan lokal contractor untuk referral fee - Pricing tool: Create calculator "Zona 3 markup" - Risk assessment: Setiap Zona 3 proposal harus approval direktur
2.4 OPERATIONAL COST EFFICIENCY - COMPARATIVE MATRIX
| Metric | Zona 1 | Zona 2 | Zona 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jarak (one way) | 5-12 km | 15-25 km | 25-40 km |
| Waktu tempuh | 20-40 min | 1-1.5 jam | 2-3 jam |
| Transport/hari | 20-40k | 60-100k | 150-200k |
| Material delivery | 0-50k | 100-200k | 300-500k |
| Mandor efficiency | Multi-site | Single-site | Time-loss |
| Tukang local pool | ✅ Available | ⚠️ Limited | ❌ None |
| Emergency response | <1 jam | 1.5-2 jam | 3-4 jam |
| Vendor credit terms | ✅ Good | ⚠️ OK | ❌ Advance payment |
| Overhead markup needed | Baseline | +10-15% | +20-25% |
| Minimum project size | 100 jt | 250 jt | 400 jt |
| Margin average | 64% | 68% * | 48-65% ** |
| Recommended focus | ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐⭐ | ⭐⭐⭐ |
Zona 2 margin tinggi karena selektif large project
*Zona 3 range lebar: BSD 48%, Tangerang premium 65%+
📐 3. CLUSTERING BERDASARKAN KOMPOSISI BIAYA
3.1 PATTERN KOMPOSISI OPTIMAL (Best Performing Projects)
Analisa 5 proyek dengan margin tertinggi (>68%):
| Proyek | Margin | RAB Composition Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| Pak Raihan - Cibitung | 78% | Persiapan 8.2% • Pondasi 5.8% • Dinding 12.1% • Beton 18.5% • Finishing 32% |
| Pak Rony - Permata | 71% | Persiapan 7.1% • Pondasi 8.2% • Dinding 11.8% • Beton 20.4% • Finishing 30% |
| Bu Tinah - Puspitek | 71% | Persiapan 6.9% • Pondasi 7.5% • Dinding 10.9% • Beton 21.2% • Finishing 31% |
| Bu Retno - Tambun | 70% | Persiapan 7.4% • Pondasi 7.8% • Dinding 11.2% • Beton 19.8% • Finishing 32% |
| Pak Yulan - Permata H2 | 69% | Persiapan 7.2% • Pondasi 8.1% • Dinding 11.5% • Beton 20.1% • Finishing 30% |
GOLDEN RATIO - OPTIMAL COMPOSITION:
| Kategori | Range % | Sub-komponen |
|---|---|---|
| PERSIAPAN & MOBILISASI | 7.0-8.5% | |
| Mobilisasi | 1.0-2.0% | |
| Bongkaran | 2.0-3.5% | |
| Tools & Support | 1.5-2.5% | |
| Buang puing | 1.0-2.0% | |
| STRUKTUR FOUNDATION | 13-16% | |
| Galian & Pondasi | 6.0-8.5% | |
| Sloof | 6.0-8.0% | |
| DINDING | 10.5-12.5% | |
| Pasang bata ringan | ~40% dari dinding | |
| Plester + Acian | ~50% dari dinding | |
| Opening | ~10% dari dinding | |
| BETON STRUKTUR | 18-22% | |
| Kolom | ~35% dari beton | |
| Balok | ~30% dari beton | |
| Plat lantai | ~25% dari beton | |
| Ring balk | ~10% dari beton | |
| ATAP | 8-12% | |
| Rangka baja ringan | ~45% dari atap | |
| Genteng | ~45% dari atap | |
| Aksesoris | ~10% dari atap | |
| PLAFOND | 5-7% | |
| Gypsum + rangka | ~70% dari plafond | |
| PVC area basah | ~20% dari plafond | |
| List | ~10% dari plafond | |
| KERAMIK & TILE | 9-12% | |
| Keramik lantai | ~60% dari keramik | |
| Keramik dinding | ~30% dari keramik | |
| Plint | ~10% dari keramik | |
| KUSEN & PINTU | 7-10% | |
| Kusen aluminium | ~30% dari kusen | |
| Pintu | ~50% dari kusen | |
| Jendela | ~20% dari kusen | |
| PENGECATAN | 6-9% | |
| Cat eksterior | ~40% dari cat | |
| Cat interior | ~45% dari cat | |
| Waterproofing | ~15% dari cat | |
| INSTALASI ME | 6-9% | |
| Listrik | ~55% dari ME | |
| Sanitasi | ~45% dari ME | |
| PEKERJAAN BESI | 8-11% | |
| Railing | ~40% dari besi | |
| Canopy | ~35% dari besi | |
| Lain-lain | ~25% dari besi |
3.2 DANGER ZONE - COMPOSITION YANG HARUS DIWASPADAI
RED FLAGS
Composition yang harus diwaspadai:
- Persiapan > 12%
- Indicator: Bongkaran extensive atau site sulit
- Risk: Hidden cost mobilisasi
-
Action: Investigate detail, bisa naikan RAB atau decline
-
Beton > 25%
- Indicator: Struktur over-design atau multiple level
- Risk: Cost overrun material + waktu curing
-
Action: Review structural design, optimize
-
Kusen & Pintu > 12%
- Indicator: Premium spec atau oversized
- Risk: Material price volatile, installasi lama
-
Action: Confirm spec detail, lock price with supplier
-
Atap > 15%
- Indicator: Complex roof design atau premium material
- Risk: Weather dependent, installation skill required
-
Action: Timeline buffer, experienced tukang
-
Total Finishing (Keramik + Cat + Kusen) > 38%
- Indicator: Over-spec finishing vs struktur
- Risk: Client expectation tinggi, rework risk
- Action: Scope clarity, sample approval process
CASE STUDY DISASTER: Bu Raras - Cimanggis
Margin: -34% LOSS!
Probable composition issues (need RAB verification): - Kemungkinan over-spec tanpa proper pricing - Change order tidak terkontrol - Timeline overrun (overhead membengkak)
Lesson: Composition ratio harus dijaga dalam "golden ratio" range
3.3 MATERIAL COST OPTIMIZATION STRATEGY
Breakdown Typical Material Cost (Based on Best Performers):
| Material Category | % of RAB | Procurement Strategy | Margin Opportunity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Semen & Agregat | 8-12% | Bulk order monthly | 5-8% saving |
| Besi & Beton | 10-15% | Lock price per project | 3-5% saving |
| Bata Ringan | 4-6% | Standing order | 8-10% saving |
| Rangka Atap | 3-5% | Supplier partnership | 10-12% saving |
| Keramik & Tile | 6-9% | Volume nego | 12-15% saving |
| Cat & Finishing | 3-5% | Brand partnership | 8-10% saving |
| ME Materials | 4-6% | Toko langganan | 10-15% saving |
| Kusen & Pintu | 6-8% | Fabricator direct | 15-20% saving |
TOTAL POTENTIAL SAVING: 10-12% dari RAB jika procurement optimal!
CURRENT STATE vs OPTIMAL:
Assumption: Renovasia saat ini achieve 8-10% saving dari random procurement.
OPPORTUNITY: Additional 2-4% margin bisa didapat dengan: 1. Volume consolidation: Gabung procurement 2-3 project 2. Vendor partnership: Annual contract dengan 3-5 supplier utama 3. Payment terms: 30-45 hari (vs cash) → cash flow benefit 4. Direct fabricator: Eliminate middleman untuk kusen, pintu, railing
ACTION PLAN - MATERIAL PROCUREMENT OPTIMIZATION:
QUICK WIN (1-3 bulan): - [ ] Identify top 5 supplier by volume - [ ] Negotiate volume discount 10-15% + payment terms 30 hari - [ ] Consolidate order: 1x per 2 minggu instead of ad-hoc
MEDIUM TERM (3-6 bulan): - [ ] Annual partnership contract dengan: - Toko bangunan utama (semen, agregat, besi) - Supplier keramik - Supplier cat - Fabricator kusen/pintu - [ ] Setup standing order untuk item standard (bata ringan, pipa, kabel) - [ ] Inventory mini-warehouse untuk fast-moving items
LONG TERM (6-12 bulan): - [ ] Procurement software/system (track pricing, vendor performance) - [ ] Vendor diversification (2-3 option per category) - [ ] Direct import untuk high-volume items (genteng, keramik)
EXPECTED IMPACT: - Material cost saving: +2-4% margin - Cash flow: 30-45 hari payment terms = working capital release - Timeline: -10% faster (no material delay)
🏗️ 4. CLUSTERING BERDASARKAN TIPE PEKERJAAN
4.1 NEW CONSTRUCTION (Full Build)
Projects: 8 dari 28 project
| Proyek | RAB | Luas | Margin | Characteristic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pak Warga - Sawangan Baru | 221 jt | 60m² | 57% | Rumah baru full |
| Bu Sella - Citeureup | 267 jt | 78m² | 55% | Full construction |
| Pak Raihan - Cibitung | 311 jt | 105m² | 78% ⭐ | New build |
| Pak Bangkit - Sawangan | 332 jt | 100m² | 62% | Full build |
| Pak Firman - Cinere | 463 jt | 140m² | 68% | 2 lantai baru |
| Bu Retno - Tambun | 487 jt | 150m² | 70% | Full construction |
| Pak Yulan - Permata H2 | 578 jt | 175m² | 69% | 2 lantai baru |
| Pak Rony - Permata | 668 jt | 200m² | 71% | 3 lantai baru |
Average Margin: 66% ✅
Pattern: - Persiapan lower: 6-9% (no bongkaran, mostly mobilisasi + tools) - Struktur higher: 20-28% (pondasi + full beton structure) - Predictability: ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (no hidden surprise) - Timeline adherence: 85% on schedule
PROS: ✅ Margin predictable (no hidden cost from existing condition) ✅ Scope clarity (gambar lengkap, spec jelas) ✅ Efficient workflow (tidak ada bongkar-pasang, straight construction) ✅ Quality control easier (build from scratch, no adaptation)
CONS: ❌ Timeline lebih panjang (must do pondasi + struktur lengkap) ❌ Capital intensive (material volume besar di awal) ❌ Weather risk higher (struktur phase outdoor work)
SWEET SPOT: - Luas: 100-175 m² - Budget: Rp 300-600 juta - Timeline: 5-7 bulan - Expected margin: 65-70%
REKOMENDASI: ✅ PRIORITIZE segment ini karena: - Predictable margin - Less surprise - Portfolio building (rumah baru = showcase)
CRITICAL SUCCESS FACTORS: 1. Survey tanah detail (konsistensi tanah, level, drainase) 2. Gambar & spec approved before RAB (avoid change order) 3. Vendor lock untuk material struktur (avoid price volatility) 4. Timeline phasing strict: - Month 1: Pondasi + sloof - Month 2-3: Struktur beton + dinding - Month 4-5: Atap + ME roughing - Month 6-7: Finishing
4.2 MAJOR RENOVATION (Structural + Full Upgrade)
Projects: 12 dari 28 project
| Proyek | RAB | Luas | Margin | Scope |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bu Titik - Jatijajar | 216 jt | 71m² | 61% | Tambah lantai 2 |
| Pak Warga - Sawangan Lama | 177 jt | 63m² | 67% | Total renovation |
| Pak Ardy - Cilodong | 328 jt | 98m² | 59% | Add floor + exterior |
| Bu Sarah - Ciracas | 350 jt | 120m² | 67% | Major upgrade |
| Pak Abdul Kohir - Beji | 388 jt | 120m² | 59% | Full renovation |
| Pak Andre - Permata H3 | 499 jt | 139m² | 64% | Structural + finish |
| Bu Hanny - GTP C15 | 854 jt | 240m² | 68% | Total overhaul |
Average Margin: 64% ✅
Pattern: - Persiapan higher: 10-15% (bongkaran extensive) - Struktur moderate: 15-22% (partial existing, partial new) - Finishing higher: 35-40% (semua finishing baru) - Surprise factor: ⭐⭐⭐ (medium risk hidden issue)
PROS: ✅ Margin solid (64% average) ✅ Client commitment (punya rumah, long-term investment mindset) ✅ Mix skill utilization (bongkar, renovate, new build)
CONS: ❌ Hidden cost risk (kondisi existing tidak terlihat until bongkar) ❌ Timeline uncertainty (bisa menemukan problem mid-project) ❌ Coordination complex (existing utility, neighbor, dll) ❌ Rework risk (existing tidak standard, perlu adaptation)
RISK MITIGATION: 1. Pre-survey ultra detail: - Bongkar sample area untuk inspect kondisi dalam - Foto existing full + measurement - Client interview: history rumah (renovasi sebelumnya, issue, dll)
- Contingency budget:
- Small project (<250 jt): +10% contingency
-
Medium/Large (>250 jt): +8% contingency
-
Phased payment:
- 30% DP
- 40% after bongkar + structure (critical checkpoint!)
-
30% completion
-
Change order protocol:
- Discover hidden issue → foto + estimate → client approval → proceed
- No proceeding tanpa approval tertulis
REKOMENDASI: ✅ ACCEPT dengan proper risk assessment - Survey wajib ultra-detail - Contingency budget must - Client expectation: "mungkin ada surprise, akan inform & estimate"
4.3 PARTIAL RENOVATION (Exterior/Interior Only)
Projects: 5 dari 28 project
| Proyek | RAB | Scope | Margin |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pak Purwoko - Banjaran | 160 jt | Tambah lantai 2 partial | 60% |
| Pak Muhdi - Jagakarsa | 34.5 jt | Waterproofing + toilet | Unknown |
| Optik Jinan | 20.7 jt | Interior cabinet | Unknown |
| Pak Andy - BSD Exterior | 250 jt | Exterior only | Unknown |
Average Margin: 60% (dari data available)
Characteristics: - Scope narrow tapi specific - Timeline short: 1-3 bulan - Capital low per project
CHALLENGE: - Mobilisasi tidak sebanding jika project kecil + jauh - Margin thin jika tidak proper pricing - Volume needed untuk profitability
STRATEGY: ✅ Bundle approach: - Partial reno + maintenance contract - Partial reno + future full reno pipeline
✅ Cluster locality: - Accept hanya jika dalam Zona 1 - Atau bundle dengan existing nearby project
✅ Premium pricing: - Mobilisasi minimum: Rp 2.5 juta - Small project surcharge: +15%
REKOMENDASI: ⚠️ Selective: - Existing client (relationship building) - Zona 1 only - Bundled dengan opportunity lain - Atau reject dengan referral ke partner
⚠️ 5. RISK CLUSTERING & MITIGATION
5.1 LOW RISK PROFILE
Characteristics: - New construction, Zona 1, 100-400 juta, 60-120m² - Client financially stable, scope clear - Timeline 4-6 bulan
Projects: Pak Raihan, Pak Bangkit, Bu Sella, Pak Ardy
Success Rate: 95%+
Expected Margin: 62-70%
STRATEGY: AGGRESSIVELY PURSUE
5.2 MEDIUM RISK PROFILE
Characteristics: - Major renovation OR Zona 2, 250-700 juta - Some uncertainty in scope atau lokasi jauh - Timeline 5-8 bulan
Projects: Bu Titik, Pak Firman, Bu Retno, Pak Yulan
Success Rate: 85%
Expected Margin: 60-68%
STRATEGY: ACCEPT dengan mitigation - Contingency 8-10% - Client communication ketat - Phased payment
5.3 HIGH RISK PROFILE
Characteristics: - Zona 3 OR >700 juta OR complex commercial - Client demanding atau scope ambiguity - Timeline >8 bulan
Projects: Bu Tinah (success case), PT Soewarna, BSD projects (mixed result)
Success Rate: 70%
Expected Margin: 48-71% (wide range!)
STRATEGY: HIGHLY SELECTIVE - Must meet ALL criteria (size, DP, scope clarity, lokasi premium pricing) - Direktur approval required - Dedicated PM + QC - Contingency 12-15%
🎯 6. ACTIONABLE DECISION MATRIX
6.1 PROJECT ACCEPTANCE FLOWCHART
survey tanah detail] L -->|Major Renovation| N[⚠️ ACCEPT
contingency 8-10%] L -->|Partial/Small| O[⚠️ SELECTIVE
bundle atau Zona 1 only] M --> P{CEK CAPACITY} N --> P O --> P P --> Q{Current WIP} Q -->|< 3 project| R[✅ ACCEPT] Q -->|3-5 project| S[⚠️ CONDITIONAL
jika timeline fit] Q -->|> 5 project| T[❌ DEFER
waitlist] P --> U{Premium project ongoing?} U -->|Yes| V[❌ No additional premium
max 1] U -->|No| W[✅ OK] P --> X{Zona 3 ongoing?} X -->|Yes| Y[❌ No additional Zona 3] X -->|No| Z[✅ OK] R --> AA{FINANCIAL CHECK} S --> AA W --> AA Z --> AA AA --> AB{DP commitment} AB -->|< Rp 250 jt project| AC[30% DP] AB -->|Rp 250-700 jt| AD[30-40% DP] AB -->|> Rp 700 jt| AE[40%+ DP] AA --> AF{Payment terms clear?} AF -->|Yes| AG[✅ Must] AG --> AH[RAB PREPARATION] AH --> AI[Use template based on bracket] AI --> AJ[Apply zona markup if needed] AJ --> AK[Check composition vs golden ratio] AK --> AL[Contingency inclusion 8-15%] AL --> AM[Timeline estimate + buffer] AM --> AN{APPROVAL} AN -->|Low risk| AO[Estimator approval] AN -->|Medium risk| AP[Project Manager approval] AN -->|High risk| AQ[Direktur approval] AO --> AR[✅ DEAL / ❌ DECLINE] AP --> AR AQ --> AR
6.2 PRICING CALCULATOR TEMPLATE
BASE CALCULATION (Zona 1 Reference):
Step 1: DETERMINE BASE PRICE/M²
- Small project (60-80m²): Rp 3.0-3.5 juta/m²
- Medium (81-120m²): Rp 3.2-3.6 juta/m²
- Large (121-180m²): Rp 3.3-3.7 juta/m²
- Premium (>180m²): Rp 3.4-3.8 juta/m²
Step 2: APPLY COMPLEXITY FACTOR
- New construction: Baseline
- Major renovation: +5%
- Structural addition: +8%
- Partial renovation: +10% (small project surcharge)
Step 3: APPLY ZONA MULTIPLIER
- Zona 1: 1.0x
- Zona 2: 1.10x
- Zona 3: 1.20-1.25x
Step 4: ADD SPECIAL CONDITIONS
- Premium spec: +10-15%
- Complex roof: +5%
- Difficult site access: +8%
- Timeline urgent (<standard): +15%
Step 5: CONTINGENCY
- Low risk: +0% (already in base calculation)
- Medium risk: +8%
- High risk: +12%
FINAL RAB = (Base × Luas × Complexity × Zona × Special) + Contingency
EXAMPLE:
Project: Major renovation, 100m², Zona 2 (Bekasi), standard spec
| Step | Calculation | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Base | 3.4 juta/m² (medium bracket) | Rp 3.40 jt/m² |
| Complexity | +5% (major reno) | Rp 3.57 jt/m² |
| Zona | 1.10x | Rp 3.93 jt/m² |
| Special | 0 | Rp 3.93 jt/m² |
| Subtotal | 3.93 × 100m² | Rp 393 juta |
| Contingency | +8% | Rp 424.4 juta |
| RAB PROPOSAL | Rp 424 juta | |
| Expected margin | 62-65% | |
| Timeline | 5.5 bulan |
6.3 TIMELINE ESTIMATION MATRIX
| Project Bracket | Zona 1 | Zona 2 | Zona 3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Micro (<100jt) | 1-2.5 bulan | 1.5-3 bulan | ❌ Decline |
| Small (100-250jt) | 3-4 bulan | 3.5-4.5 bulan | ❌ Decline |
| Medium (250-450jt) | 4.5-6 bulan | 5-6.5 bulan | 5.5-7 bulan |
| Large (450-700jt) | 5.5-7.5 bulan | 6-8 bulan | 6.5-8.5 bulan |
| Premium (>700jt) | 7-9 bulan | 7.5-9.5 bulan | 8-10 bulan |
BUFFER RULES: - New construction: +0 bulan (predictable) - Major renovation: +0.5 bulan (discovery risk) - Zona 2: +0.5 bulan (logistic) - Zona 3: +1 bulan (logistic + coordination) - Premium spec: +1 bulan (detail work) - Monsoon season (Nov-Mar): +0.5 bulan
7. STRATEGIC RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 SHORT TERM (1-3 Bulan) - QUICK WINS
1. ZONA FOCUS - [ ] 80% marketing effort ke Zona 1 (Depok-Sawangan-Cimanggis) - [ ] Create referral incentive untuk existing client di Zona 1 - [ ] Soft-decline Zona 3 kecuali >400jt dengan proper pricing
2. PRICING DISCIPLINE - [ ] Implement pricing calculator (template di section 6.2) - [ ] Minimum mobilisasi Rp 2.5 juta for any project - [ ] Zona markup strictly applied: Zona 2 +10%, Zona 3 +20%
3. MATERIAL PROCUREMENT - [ ] Identify top 5 vendor by spending - [ ] Negotiate volume discount 10-15% - [ ] Setup payment terms 30 hari
EXPECTED IMPACT: - Margin improvement: +3-5% - Operational efficiency: +15% - Timeline adherence: 85% → 90%
7.2 MEDIUM TERM (3-6 Bulan) - SYSTEM BUILDING
1. TEMPLATE & SOP - [ ] RAB template per bracket (Small, Medium, Large, Premium) - [ ] Timeline phasing SOP per tipe project - [ ] Quality control checklist per phase - [ ] Change order protocol documentation
2. VENDOR PARTNERSHIP - [ ] Annual contract dengan 3-5 supplier utama - [ ] Standing order untuk item standard - [ ] Backup vendor per category (risk mitigation)
3. TEAM DEVELOPMENT - [ ] Mandor training: timeline discipline, cost control - [ ] Tukang pool recruitment fokus Zona 1 - [ ] Project manager dedicated untuk >500jt project
4. FINANCIAL STRUCTURE - [ ] WIP financing line Rp 200 juta (untuk handle 2-3 medium project parallel) - [ ] Payment terms enforcement: 30%-40%-30% strict - [ ] Cash flow projection tool per project
EXPECTED IMPACT: - Margin improvement: +2-3% (total 5-8% from short term) - Capacity increase: +30% (bisa handle more project dengan existing resource) - Risk reduction: 50% (less surprise, less loss)
7.3 LONG TERM (6-12 Bulan) - SCALE & OPTIMIZATION
1. MARKET POSITIONING - [ ] Brand focus: Premium residential Zona 1 - [ ] Portfolio showcase: Top 10 projects (>65% margin) - [ ] Client testimony video & case study - [ ] Award/certification: ISO, LPJK, dll untuk credibility
2. OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE - [ ] Procurement system: Software untuk tracking price, vendor performance - [ ] Project management tool: Gantt, milestone tracking, cost control - [ ] Inventory mini-warehouse: Fast-moving items (reduce lead time)
3. DIVERSIFICATION (SELECTIVE) - [ ] Maintenance contract: Recurring revenue dari existing client - [ ] Design-build package: Premium offering (design + construction) - [ ] Commercial selective: Office fit-out di Zona 1 only (tes market)
4. FINANCIAL OPTIMIZATION - [ ] Direct import: High-volume material (genteng, keramik) - [ ] Vendor credit line: 45-60 hari (from 30) - [ ] Leasing: Equipment (scaffolding, mixer, dll) untuk reduce capital
EXPECTED IMPACT: - Margin improvement: +2% (total 7-10% cumulative) - Revenue growth: +40-50% (more capacity + better margin) - Business valuation: 2-3x (system + brand + client base)
8. MONITORING & KPI
8.1 PROJECT LEVEL KPI
Per Project Tracking:
| KPI | Target | Measurement |
|---|---|---|
| Margin actual vs RAB | >60% | (Revenue - Cost) / Revenue |
| Timeline adherence | >85% | Finish within estimate +10% |
| Client satisfaction | >4.5/5 | Post-project survey |
| Change order % | <10% | Change order value / RAB |
| Payment collection | <7 hari | Days from invoice to payment |
| Rework % | <3% | Rework cost / total cost |
Traffic Light System: - 🟢 Green: Target achieved - 🟡 Yellow: Within 10% of target (monitor) - 🔴 Red: >10% deviation (action required)
8.2 BUSINESS LEVEL KPI
Monthly Dashboard:
| KPI | Target 2026 | Current Baseline (2025) |
|---|---|---|
| Average margin | 65% | 64% (from 22 projects) |
| Project per month | 4-5 | 3 (37 projects / 12 months) |
| Revenue per month | 350-400 jt | 292 jt (10.8M / 37 projects) |
| Zona 1 % | 70%+ | 50% (14/28 projects) |
| Timeline on-time % | 90%+ | 85% (estimate) |
| Client repeat/referral % | 40%+ | 30% (estimate) |
| Average project size | 350 jt | 290 jt |
Quarterly Review: - Margin trend by zona - Margin trend by bracket - Vendor performance - Team productivity - Cash flow health
8.3 RED FLAG EARLY WARNING
Immediate Action Required If:
Project Level
- Margin prediction drop >10% from RAB
- Timeline delay >2 minggu dari schedule
- Client payment delay >7 hari dari termin
- Change order accumulation >10% of RAB
- Team conflict/turnover
Business Level
- Monthly margin average <58%
- Zona 3 projects >20% of WIP
- Cash flow negative >2 bulan
- Premium project >1 concurrent
- Client complaint rate >10%
Response Protocol: 1. Investigate root cause (24 jam) 2. Action plan mitigation (48 jam) 3. Escalate to direktur if needed 4. Document lesson learned 5. Update SOP/template to prevent recurrence
9. KESIMPULAN & NEXT ACTIONS
9.1 KEY TAKEAWAYS
CLUSTERING INSIGHTS:
- TIMELINE vs RAB VALUE:
- Micro (<100jt): 1-3 bulan → selective acceptance
- Small (100-250jt): 3-4 bulan → SWEET SPOT, aggressive pursue
- Medium (250-450jt): 4-6 bulan → PRIMARY TARGET, 63% margin average
- Large (450-700jt): 5-8 bulan → HIGH VALUE, 68% margin but capacity limited
-
Premium (>700jt): 7-10 bulan → SELECTIVE, max 1 concurrent
-
LOKASI vs OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY:
- Zona 1 (Depok-Sawangan-Cimanggis): GOLDEN CLUSTER → 64% margin, lowest overhead
- Zona 2 (Bekasi-Bogor-Jaktim): PROFITABLE if >250jt → 68% margin, +10% markup needed
-
Zona 3 (Tangerang-BSD): RISKY → 48-65% margin wide range, only if >400jt + 20% markup
-
KOMPOSISI OPTIMAL:
- Persiapan: 7-8.5% | Struktur: 13-16% | Dinding: 10.5-12.5%
- Beton: 18-22% | Atap: 8-12% | Finishing: 30-35%
-
Deviasi >5% dari range = red flag, investigate!
-
BEST PRACTICE BENCHMARK:
- Pak Raihan - Cibitung: 78% margin, 310jt, Zona 2, medium bracket → REPLICATE!
- Bu Tinah - Puspitek: 71% margin, 786jt, Zona 3, premium → Proof Zona 3 bisa profitable
- Pak Rony - Permata: 71% margin, 668jt, Zona 1, large → Ideal large project
9.2 IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (Week 1)
DO NOW:
- [ ] Review current WIP projects dengan clustering lens ini
- Identify: Zona mana? Bracket mana? Margin prediction?
-
Red flag mana yang harus immediate action?
-
[ ] Setup pricing calculator (Excel/Google Sheets) based on section 6.2
- Test dengan RAB 3-5 inquiry terbaru
-
Validate: apakah pricing kita sudah optimal?
-
[ ] Vendor list & contact top 5 supplier
- Request: volume discount proposal
-
Negotiate: payment terms 30 hari
-
[ ] Team briefing - share clustering insights
- Mandor: pahami zona focus & timeline discipline
- Estimator: use new pricing calculator
- Marketing: shift focus ke Zona 1
9.3 THIS MONTH PRIORITIES
MUST DO (30 hari):
- [ ] Decline/defer any Zona 3 project <400jt
- [ ] Implement zona markup strictly (Zona 2 +10%, Zona 3 +20%)
- [ ] Close deal minimum 2 Zona 1 projects (Small/Medium bracket)
- [ ] Vendor partnership dengan minimum 2 key supplier (semen/bata, keramik)
- [ ] Template RAB finalisasi untuk Small & Medium bracket
- [ ] SOP timeline phasing documented & shared to team
SUCCESS METRICS: - New project all from Zona 1 or Zona 2 (>250jt) - Margin prediction >62% for all new RAB - Vendor discount secured >10%
9.4 QUARTERLY GOALS (3 Bulan)
TARGET Q1 2026:
- [ ] Revenue: 1.2 M (4 projects × 300jt avg)
- [ ] Margin: 65% average
- [ ] Zona 1 dominance: 75% of projects
- [ ] Timeline adherence: 90% on-time
- [ ] Vendor partnership: 5 key suppliers under contract
- [ ] Material cost saving: 10-12% vs random procurement
- [ ] Client satisfaction: >4.5/5 average
STRETCH GOALS: - 1 project replicate "Pak Raihan margin 78%" - 1 premium project (>700jt) di Zona 1 dengan margin >68% - Zero loss project
10. REALITA CASH FLOW - KENAPA MARGIN BESAR TAPI GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG
10.1 THE HARD TRUTH - GAP ANTARA MARGIN DI KERTAS vs CASH DI TANGAN
❌ DELUSI: "Margin 64% = Bisnis Sehat"
✅ REALITA: "Margin 64% Tapi Cash Flow Struggle"
WHY THE GAP?
ILUSTRASI PROJECT Rp 400 JUTA
DI KERTAS (Accrual Accounting):
| Item | Nilai | Persentase |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue | Rp 400 juta | 100% |
| Direct Cost | Rp 144 juta | 36% |
| Gross Margin | Rp 256 juta | 64% ✅ LOOKS AMAZING! |
REALITA CASH FLOW:
| Month | Transaksi | Inflow | Outflow | Net Cash | Saldo Running |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | Client DP 30% | +120 jt | +120 jt | +120 jt | |
| Material DP | -80 jt | ||||
| Upah minggu 1-4 | -20 jt | +20 jt | +20 jt | ||
| 1 | Upah + material | -40 jt | |||
| HO cost (gaji, sewa) | -30 jt | -70 jt | -50 jt ❌ | ||
| 2 | Client termin 2 40% | +160 jt | |||
| Material + upah | -50 jt | ||||
| HO cost | -30 jt | +80 jt | +30 jt ⚠️ | ||
| 3-4 | Pengeluaran terus jalan | ||||
| Client payment belum masuk | BUTUH WORKING CAPITAL! |
INI KENAPA "GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG": - Margin 64% itu total project, tapi cash datang bertahap - Pengeluaran continuous (upah tukang, material, HO cost) - Working capital tidak cukup untuk bridge the gap - Harus pakai cash dari project lain untuk bayar project ini = ROBBING PETER TO PAY PAUL
10.2 DATA HISTORIS - PROOF CASH FLOW PROBLEM
TAHUN 2022: Margin 52.7% Tapi Defisit Overhead Rp 169 Juta
| Item | Amount | Reality Check |
|---|---|---|
| Project Margin | +Rp 594 juta (52.7%) | ✅ Excellent di kertas |
| Overhead Cost | -Rp 989 juta | ❌ Including: |
| └─ Kas Yamala | -Rp 246 juta | Pure expense, no revenue |
| └─ Kas Joglo | -Rp 282 juta | Pure expense, no revenue |
| NET RESULT | +Rp 197 juta (9.7%) | ⚠️ Tipis banget! |
| Working Capital | Rp 146 juta | ❌ Tidak cukup! |
PROBLEM: - Total defisit overhead: Rp 528 juta (Yamala + Joglo) - Ini 89% dari project profit! - Project untung Rp 594 jt, tapi Rp 528 jt "hilang" di overhead - Sisa cuma Rp 66 juta setelah cover overhead bermasalah
KENAPA GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG:
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Working Capital Available | Rp 146 juta |
| Concurrent projects (3 × Rp 200jt each) | |
| - Project A: Need WC | Rp 100 juta |
| - Project B: Need WC | Rp 100 juta |
| - Project C: Need WC | Rp 100 juta |
| TOTAL NEED | Rp 300 juta |
| GAP | -Rp 154 juta DEFICIT! |
SOLUTION: Pakai cash dari termin Project A untuk bayar Project B (GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG!)
TAHUN 2024: Margin 29.5% & Cash Flow Struggle
Dari cashflow analysis: - Total projects: 82 proyek - 18 projects RUGI (22.5%) - Biggest losses: - Bogor: -Rp 1.39 Triliun ❌ - Kas Joglo: -Rp 716 Miliar ❌ - Kas Yamala: -Rp 701 Miliar ❌
PATTERN SAMA: Overhead accounts tanpa revenue jadi black hole!
TAHUN 2025: Margin 59.1% Tapi...
Mari kita lihat ACTUAL SITUATION:
| Metric | On Paper | Reality |
|---|---|---|
| Total GM 2025 | Rp 3.511 M (59.1%) | ✅ Great! |
| Total projects | 37 projects (11 months) | Average 3-4/month |
| 7 Projects RUGI | ❌ 19% failure rate | Still bleeding |
| Average project size | Rp 161 juta | Need 3+ concurrent for HO |
| Fix Cost HO/month | Rp 30 juta | MUST PAY MONTHLY |
REALITA CASH NEED:
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| FIX COST HO PER BULAN | Rp 30 juta |
| Gaji staff/management | Rp 17.6 juta |
| Sewa kantor | Rp 0.8 juta |
| Marketing | Rp 2.8 juta |
| Operasional | Rp 9.9 juta (listrik, phone, transport, dll) |
| PROJECT VARIABLE COST | |
| Concurrent 3 projects @ Rp 300 jt each | |
| Working capital need per project | Rp 80-120 juta |
| Total WC need | Rp 240-360 juta |
| Payment gap duration | 2-3 months |
| Emergency buffer | Rp 50 juta |
| TOTAL CASH NEED AT ANY POINT | Rp 380 juta minimum! |
| ACTUAL CASH AVAILABLE (estimate) | Rp 150-200 juta ❌ |
| GAP | Rp 180-230 juta = HARUS GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG! |
10.3 ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS - KENAPA CASH FLOW BERMASALAH?
BUKAN MASALAH MARGIN (margin sudah excellent 59-64%)
TAPI MASALAH:
1. TIMING MISMATCH - Cash In vs Cash Out
| Cash Out (Immediate) | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Month 1: | |
| Material DP | Rp 80 juta (60% of total material) |
| Upah tukang | Rp 15 juta (weekly payment) |
| HO cost | Rp 30 juta (gaji, sewa - MUST PAY!) |
| Operational | Rp 10 juta (transport, konsumsi, dll) |
| TOTAL MONTH 1 | Rp 135 juta KELUAR |
| Cash In (Delayed) | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Month 1: | |
| Client DP 30% | Rp 120 juta (sudah masuk Month 0) |
| Termin 2 (40%) | BELUM! (Month 2-3) |
| TOTAL MONTH 1 | Rp 0 MASUK |
DEFICIT MONTH 1: -Rp 135 juta
JADI: Meski margin akhirnya 64%, tapi bulan 1-2 DEFICIT DULU!
2. WORKING CAPITAL INADEQUATE
Kalkulasi WC Need:
| Scenario | Projects | Avg Size | WC/Project | Total WC Need | Typical WC Available | GAP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Minimum | 2 | 200 jt | 80 jt | 160 jt | 150 jt | -10 jt ⚠️ |
| Normal | 3 | 250 jt | 100 jt | 300 jt | 150 jt | -150 jt ❌ |
| Busy | 4 | 300 jt | 120 jt | 480 jt | 150 jt | -330 jt ❌ |
KESIMPULAN: WC selalu defisit kalau ada 3+ concurrent projects!
BUKTI dari 2022: - Working capital: Rp 146 juta - Need untuk 3 projects: Rp 300 juta - Deficit: Rp 154 juta → Must rob Peter to pay Paul!
3. OVERHEAD BLACK HOLE - No Revenue Stream
CRITICAL FINDING:
| Overhead Item | 2022 | 2024/2025 | Pattern |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kas Yamala | -Rp 246 jt | -Rp 701 M | ❌ Pure expense, NO INCOME |
| Kas Joglo | -Rp 282 jt | -Rp 716 M | ❌ Pure expense, NO INCOME |
| Kios Renovasia (2025) | N/A | -Rp 81.6 jt | ❌ NO INCOME |
| TOTAL DRAIN | -Rp 528 jt | -Rp 1.5 M | Consistent pattern! |
Impact ke Cash Flow:
| Scenario | Nilai |
|---|---|
| WITHOUT overhead black hole: | |
| Project margin | Rp 594 juta |
| HO legit cost | Rp 461 juta (overhead yang punya revenue) |
| NET | Rp 133 juta (22.4% margin) ✅ SUSTAINABLE |
| WITH overhead black hole (ACTUAL): | |
| Project margin | Rp 594 juta |
| HO legit cost | Rp 461 juta |
| Black hole | -Rp 528 juta ❌ |
| NET | Rp 65 juta (11% margin) ⚠️ TIPIS BANGET! |
MAKANYA: Margin 52% jadi cuma 11% after overhead!
4. CLIENT PAYMENT DELAY - Systemic Issue
Typical payment flow:
| Termin | Contract | Reality | Delay |
|---|---|---|---|
| DP 30% | Day 0 | Day 0 | ✅ OK |
| Termin 2 (40%) | Month 2 | Month 2.5 | +15 days ⚠️ |
| Termin 3 (20%) | Month 4 | Month 4.5 | +15 days ⚠️ |
| Final (10%) | Completion | +30-60 days | +1-2 months ❌ |
Impact:
| Expected Cash Flow | Month | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Month 0: DP | 0 | Rp 120 jt |
| Month 2: Termin 2 | 2 | Rp 160 jt |
| Month 4: Termin 3 | 4 | Rp 80 jt |
| Month 5: Final | 5 | Rp 40 jt |
| ACTUAL Cash Flow (with delay) | Month | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| 0 | Rp 120 jt ✅ | |
| 2.5 | Rp 160 jt ⚠️ (+15 days late) | |
| 4.5 | Rp 80 jt ⚠️ (+15 days late) | |
| 6-7 | Rp 40 jt ❌ (+30-60 days late!) |
GAP: 2 months cash shortfall in month 5-6 = Need Rp 60 juta bridge from other project = GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG!
5. NO FINANCIAL RESERVE/BUFFER
Industry Standard: - Operating reserve: 3-6 months HO cost - WC reserve: 30-40% of annual revenue - Emergency fund: 10-15% of annual revenue
Renovasia Current (estimate): - Operating reserve: ~5 months HO cost (Rp 150 jt / Rp 30 jt) ⚠️ BORDERLINE - WC reserve: ~2% of revenue (Rp 150 jt / Rp 6 M) ❌ WAY TOO LOW! - Emergency fund: None ❌
Comparison:
| Metric | Renovasia | Industry Standard | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| Operating reserve | Rp 150 jt (~5 mo) | Rp 90-180 jt (3-6 mo) | ✅ Borderline OK |
| WC reserve | Rp 150 jt (2% revenue) | Rp 1.8-2.4 M (30-40%) | ❌ -Rp 1.65 M! |
| Emergency fund | Rp 0 | Rp 600-900 jt (10-15%) | ❌ -Rp 600 jt! |
TOTAL CAPITAL SHORTFALL: Rp 2.25 Milyar!
MAKANYA GALI LOBANG TUTUP LOBANG!
10.4 THE VICIOUS CYCLE - Bagaimana Situasi Memperburuk Dirinya
| THE DEATH SPIRAL |
| 1. WC Insufficient ↓ 2. Ambil cash dari Project A untuk Project B ↓ 3. Project A delay payment ke supplier ↓ 4. Supplier naik harga atau minta cash (no kredit) ↓ 5. Cost naik, margin turun ↓ 6. Margin turun, WC makin tipis ↓ 7. Makin desperate → ambil project low margin ↓ 8. Low margin project = less cash generation ↓ 9. WC makin tipis ↓ 10. Back to Step 1 (VICIOUS CYCLE!) |
REAL EXAMPLE from 2025:
- 7 projects RUGI (19% failure rate)
- Kemungkinan besar: projects yang dipaksakan karena need cash
- Margin sacrifice untuk cashflow immediacy
- Result: Malah bikin cash flow WORSE!
10.5 SOLUSI - BREAK THE CYCLE
TIDAK CUKUP HANYA "ALOKASI HO 15%"!
Butuh STRUCTURAL FIX:
IMMEDIATE (1-3 Bulan): STOP THE BLEEDING
1. CUT OVERHEAD BLACK HOLE
| Current Black Holes | Action |
|---|---|
| Kios Renovasia: -Rp 81.6 jt (2025) | |
| Yamala/Joglo equivalent: -Rp ?? jt | |
| Other unproductive overhead | |
| Close/sell non-revenue generating units | |
| OR: Convert to revenue generating (rent out, partnership) | |
| OR: Reduce expense drastically (50-70% cut) | |
| EXPECTED SAVING | Rp 60-80 juta/year = Rp 5-7 jt/month |
2. INJECT WORKING CAPITAL (Critical!)
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| MINIMUM WC NEED | Rp 300-400 juta |
| CURRENT WC | Rp 150-200 juta (estimate) |
| GAP | Rp 150-200 juta |
| OPTIONS: | |
| A. Owner injection | Rp 200 juta capital |
| B. Credit line | Rp 200 juta @ 1-1.5%/month |
| C. Delay HO transfer | Build up Rp 200 juta over 6 months |
| D. Asset sale | Non-core assets |
| RECOMMENDED: Combination B + C | |
| Credit line | Rp 100 juta (emergency) |
| Build WC | Rp 100 juta (6 months accumulation) |
| Total | Rp 200 juta WC boost |
3. PAYMENT TERMS DISCIPLINE
NEW POLICY (Non-Negotiable)
DP Minimum: 40% (up from 30%) - Covers: Initial material DP + 1st month operation - No work start until DP cleared
Termin 2: 35% (at 40-50% completion) - Strict milestone check - Stop work if payment delay >7 days
Termin 3: 15% (at 80% completion)
Final: 10% (at handover)
NO MORE: - ❌ DP 20-25% (too low!) - ❌ "Pak, nanti aja bayarnya" (stop work immediately!) - ❌ Final payment 30-60 days after completion (max 14 days!)
IMPACT: - WC need per project: -30% (Rp 100 jt → Rp 70 jt) - Payment gap: -50% (4 weeks → 2 weeks) - Cash flow: +Rp 80-100 jt/month improvement
SHORT TERM (3-6 Bulan): BUILD BUFFER
4. FORCED SAVINGS - HO Reserve Fund
MECHANISM: Allocate margin to 3 buckets
| From Gross Margin 64% | Allocation |
|---|---|
| 15% | → HO Operating Cost (immediate use) |
| 10% | → WC Reserve (build to Rp 400 juta) |
| 5% | → Emergency Fund (build to Rp 200 juta) |
| 70% | → Company Profit |
TIMELINE: - Month 1-6: Aggressive saving mode - HO Reserve: Rp 20 jt/month × 6 = Rp 120 jt - WC Reserve: Rp 30 jt/month × 6 = Rp 180 jt - Total accumulation: Rp 300 juta
After 6 months: - WC at Rp 330-380 juta ✅ HEALTHY! - Emergency fund Rp 120 juta ✅ 4 months buffer - Can reduce saving rate to 5% total
5. PROJECT SELECTIVITY - MARGIN OVER VOLUME
| OLD MINDSET | NEW POLICY |
|---|---|
| Ambil semua project untuk cashflow | Reject low-margin projects |
| Result: 7 projects rugi (19% failure), margin sacrifice | Minimum acceptance criteria: |
| - Gross margin: >60% | |
| - Project size: >Rp 150 juta (efficiency) | |
| - Client DP: >40% (non-negotiable) | |
| - Location: Zona 1-2 only (operational efficiency) | |
| - Timeline: Clear & realistic |
EXPECTED: - Reduce projects from 37 → 25-30/year - BUT increase avg margin from 59% → 65-68% - AND reduce failure from 19% → <10% - NET CASH GENERATION: +20-30%!
MEDIUM TERM (6-12 Bulan): STRUCTURAL STRENGTH
6. REVENUE DIVERSIFICATION - Create Stable Cash Streams
PROBLEM: 100% revenue from project-based (lumpy cashflow)
SOLUTION: Add recurring/stable revenue
| Target | Detail |
|---|---|
| A. Property Management (Already proven!) | |
| 2025 performance | Rp 203 jt profit |
| Expand | 2-3x capacity |
| Target 2026 | Rp 500-600 jt/year = Rp 42-50 jt/month ✅ |
| B. Maintenance Contracts | |
| Existing clients | 30+ satisfied clients |
| Package | Rp 1-2 jt/month maintenance fee |
| Target | 10-15 clients |
| Revenue | Rp 10-30 jt/month recurring ✅ |
| C. Design Fees (Upfront Cash) | |
| Design package | Rp 10-20 jt per project |
| Collected | BEFORE construction |
| Margin | 100% margin, pure cashflow boost |
IMPACT: - Total recurring: Rp 60-80 jt/month - Covers 200% of HO cost! - Project margin becomes PURE PROFIT - Cash flow stress: ELIMINATED!
7. VENDOR PARTNERSHIP - Payment Terms Extension
| Current | Target |
|---|---|
| Pay material 50-70% upfront, balance COD | 30-45 days payment terms |
STRATEGY: - Annual volume commitment to 3-5 key vendors - Guaranteed payment (track record) - Regular order (predictability) - Exchange for 30-45 days terms
CALCULATION:
| Item | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Monthly material | Rp 80 juta (estimate) |
| Current: Pay upfront | WC locked Rp 80 jt |
| With 30-day terms: Pay next month | WC freed Rp 80 jt |
| WC IMPROVEMENT | +Rp 80 juta permanently! |
Combined with 3-4 vendors: - Total WC freed: Rp 250-320 juta ✅ GAME CHANGER!
10.6 TARGET STATE - How Success Looks Like
AFTER FIXES (12-18 Months):
| Metric | CURRENT STATE (Fragile) | TARGET STATE (Resilient) |
|---|---|---|
| Gross Margin | 64% | 66-68% |
| HO Coverage | 10.6x (looks good on paper) | 2.0-2.5x (healthy) |
| Working Capital | Rp 150-200 jt ❌ INSUFFICIENT | Rp 400-500 jt ✅ SUFFICIENT |
| Cash Flow | Gali lobang tutup lobang ❌ | Positive every month ✅ |
| Reserve | None ❌ | Rp 400 juta ✅ |
| Stress Level | 🔴 HIGH | 🟢 LOW |
MONTHLY CASH FLOW (Target State):
| Inflow | Nilai |
|---|---|
| Property mgmt | Rp 50 jt/month |
| Maintenance | Rp 20 jt/month |
| Project margin | Rp 200 jt/month (3 projects) |
| TOTAL IN | Rp 270 jt/month |
| Outflow | Nilai |
|---|---|
| HO fix cost | Rp 30 jt/month |
| Reserves | Rp 10 jt/month (maintenance level) |
| Owner draw | Rp 80 jt/month (reasonable salary) |
| TOTAL OUT | Rp 120 jt/month |
NET SURPLUS: Rp 150 jt/month ✅ HEALTHY!
Uses for surplus: - Reinvest: Equipment, tools - Expansion: Additional team - Dividend: Owner profit - Growth: Market development
10.7 BRUTAL HONESTY - Current vs Target
| Metric | Current (Fragile) | Target (Resilient) | Gap | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Working Capital | Rp 150-200 jt | Rp 400 jt | -Rp 200 jt | 6 mo |
| Monthly Cashflow | Break-even/deficit | +Rp 150 jt surplus | -Rp 150 jt | 12 mo |
| Reserve Fund | Rp 0 | Rp 400 jt | -Rp 400 jt | 12-18 mo |
| Recurring Revenue | Rp 0 | Rp 60-80 jt/mo | -Rp 70 jt | 6-12 mo |
| Vendor Terms | Cash/COD | 30-45 days | 0 days → 35 days | 3-6 mo |
| Project Success Rate | 81% (19% loss) | >90% | -9% | 6 mo |
| Overhead Efficiency | Black holes exist | All productive | Major | 3 mo |
CRITICAL PATH:
| Month 0-3: EMERGENCY MODE ├─ Inject WC Rp 100-150 juta (credit/owner) ├─ Cut overhead black holes ├─ Strict payment terms (40% DP minimum) └─ Reject low-margin projects Month 3-6: STABILIZATION ├─ Build WC to Rp 300 juta ├─ Establish vendor payment terms ├─ Launch recurring revenue streams └─ Accumulate Rp 100 juta reserve Month 6-12: GROWTH ├─ WC to Rp 400 juta ├─ Reserve to Rp 200-400 juta ├─ Recurring revenue Rp 60-80 jt/mo └─ Monthly surplus Rp 100-150 jt Month 12-18: OPTIMIZATION ├─ Scale recurring revenue ├─ Optimize project mix ├─ Build for next level (annual revenue Rp 10+ M) └─ Exit "gali lobang tutup lobang" PERMANENTLY! |
10.8 THE FORMULA (REVISED WITH REALITY)
OLD FORMULA (INCOMPLETE):
"Zona 1 Focus + Medium/Large Bracket + Composition Discipline + Vendor Partnership + HO Allocation 15% = Consistent 65%+ Margin"
NEW FORMULA (COMPLETE WITH CASH REALITY):
| SUSTAINABLE PROFITABLE BUSINESS |
| FOUNDATION (Must Have): 1. Working Capital: Rp 400+ juta └─ Support 3-4 concurrent projects WITHOUT robbing Peter 2. Emergency Reserve: Rp 200+ juta └─ 6 months HO coverage if zero revenue 3. Recurring Revenue: Rp 60-80 jt/month └─ Cover HO fix cost independently OPERATIONS (Excellence): 4. Zona 1 Focus (64% margin, low overhead) 5. Medium/Large Bracket (Rp 250-700 jt sweet spot) 6. Composition Discipline (Golden ratio) 7. Vendor Partnership (30-45 day terms) 8. Project Selectivity (>60% margin, reject rest) DISCIPLINE (Non-Negotiable): 9. Payment Terms: 40% DP minimum 10. HO Allocation: 15% dari GM 11. Reserve Building: 5-10% until target 12. Overhead Accountability: All units must justify existence ↓ RESULT: ├─ Gross Margin: 66-68% ├─ Net Margin: 50-55% (after ALL costs) ├─ Monthly Surplus: Rp 100-150 juta ├─ Cash Flow: POSITIVE every month ├─ Stress: LOW └─ "Gali Lobang Tutup Lobang": ELIMINATED! |
11. KESIMPULAN & NEXT ACTIONS (BRUTALLY HONEST VERSION)
11.1 THE UNCOMFORTABLE TRUTH
❌ DELUSI: - "Margin 64% = We're doing great!" - "Just need better HO allocation formula" - "Cash flow will fix itself"
✅ REALITA: - Margin 64% di kertas, tapi cash flow struggle tiap bulan - Gali lobang tutup lobang bukan accident, tapi systemic issue - Root cause: WC defisit Rp 200-250 juta + overhead black holes - Tidak sustainable jangka panjang
EVIDENCE: - 2022: Overhead defisit Rp 528 jt (Yamala + Joglo) - 2024: 18 projects rugi, Joglo -Rp 716 M, Yamala -Rp 701 M - 2025: 7 projects rugi (19% failure), Kios -Rp 81.6 jt - PATTERN KONSISTEN across 4 years!
IF NOTHING CHANGES: - Cycle akan continue - Stress level remain high - One bad project = potential collapse - Growth terbatas (can't scale without WC)
11.2 IMMEDIATE ACTIONS (CRITICAL - WEEK 1)
STOP DOING (Immediately): - ❌ Accepting projects <60% predicted margin - ❌ Accepting DP <40% - ❌ Funding overhead units with no revenue plan - ❌ Delaying vendor payment (destroys relationship & future terms)
START DOING (Week 1):
- [ ] AUDIT ACTUAL CASH POSITION (not accounting, real cash!)
- Berapa cash available TODAY?
- Berapa committed untuk ongoing projects?
- Berapa FREE cash (WC)?
-
Berapa utang supplier outstanding?
-
[ ] CALCULATE REAL WC NEED
- Current active projects: berapa?
- WC locked per project: berapa?
- Total WC need: berapa?
-
Gap vs available: BERAPA DEFICIT SEBENARNYA?
-
[ ] IDENTIFY OVERHEAD BLACK HOLES
- List ALL overhead accounts
- Which ones: revenue vs no revenue?
- No revenue units: JUSTIFY or CUT
-
Target: Rp 5-10 jt/month saving
-
[ ] NEW PROJECT POLICY (Effective Immediately)
- Minimum margin: 62%
- Minimum DP: 40%
- Payment terms: Non-negotiable
- Print & post di kantor!
11.3 THIS MONTH PRIORITIES (30 HARI)
MUST ACHIEVE:
- [ ] WC Injection Plan Decided
- Owner capital? Berapa? When?
- Credit line? From where? Terms?
- OR: Delay HO transfer to build WC?
-
TARGET: Secure Rp 100-150 juta additional WC
-
[ ] Cut 1-2 Overhead Black Holes
- Decision on Kios Renovasia
- Any other no-revenue units
-
TARGET: Save Rp 5-7 jt/month
-
[ ] Enforce Payment Discipline
- 40% DP: Applied to ALL new projects
- Existing projects: Negotiate acceleration
-
TARGET: Improve cash collection by 20%
-
[ ] Reject 2-3 Low-Margin Inquiries
- Practice saying "No" to <60% margin
- Even if it hurts short term
- TARGET: Build discipline muscle
SUCCESS METRIC MONTH 1: - WC increased by Rp 50-100 juta (combination of injection + collection) - Overhead cost reduced by Rp 5-7 juta/month - Zero new projects accepted with <60% margin
11.4 QUARTERLY GOALS (3 BULAN)
TARGET Q1 2026:
| Metric | Current | Q1 Target | Actions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Working Capital | Rp 150 jt | Rp 300 jt | Inject + build |
| Monthly Cash Surplus | ~Rp 0 | +Rp 50 jt | Cut cost + payment terms |
| Overhead Efficiency | Black holes exist | All justified | Close/fix unproductive |
| Project Success Rate | 81% | >90% | Better selectivity |
| Recurring Revenue | Rp 0 | Rp 20-30 jt/mo | Property mgmt + maintenance |
CRITICAL MILESTONES:
Month 1: Emergency stabilization (WC inject, cost cut)
Month 2: Payment terms enforcement showing results
Month 3: First month with positive cash surplus
IF NOT ACHIEVED: - Re-evaluate strategy - Consider more drastic measures - Might need external help (consultant, mentor)
11.5 WHAT SUCCESS LOOKS LIKE (12 MONTHS)
NOT THIS (Current "Success" - Fragile):
Revenue: Rp 6 M/year ✅
Margin: 64% ✅
Net Profit: Rp 3.5 M ✅
BUT:
Cash flow: Gali lobang tutup lobang ❌
WC: Always insufficient ❌
Stress: High every month ❌
Scalable: No ❌
Sustainable: Questionable ❌
BUT THIS (True Success - Resilient):
Revenue: Rp 7-8 M/year ✅
Margin: 66-68% ✅
Net Profit: Rp 3.8-4.2 M ✅
AND:
Cash flow: Positive every month ✅
WC: Rp 400 juta (sufficient for 4-5 projects) ✅
Reserve: Rp 400 juta (sleep well at night) ✅
Recurring: Rp 60-80 jt/month (HO covered) ✅
Stress: Low (business runs smoothly) ✅
Scalable: Yes (can add teams) ✅
Sustainable: Absolutely ✅
THE DIFFERENCE: - Not just profitable on paper - But cash-generative in reality - Not just surviving month to month - But thriving with confidence - Not hoping next project saves you - But choosing which projects to take
PENUTUP (REALITY CHECK VERSION)
Analisis clustering memberikan framework excellent untuk OPERATIONS.
Tapi CASH FLOW REALITY adalah missing piece yang critical:
✅ Optimasi pricing berdasarkan zona & bracket → DONE
✅ Fokus operasional ke high-margin territory → DONE
✅ Timeline predictability → DONE
✅ Risk mitigation → DONE
⭐ WORKING CAPITAL & CASH FLOW FIX → THIS IS THE GAME CHANGER!
Yang Paling Penting:
Margin 64% itu BUKAN kesuksesan kalau tiap bulan masih gali lobang tutup lobang.
TRUE SUCCESS = Margin bagus + Cash flow sehat + Reserve cukup + Bisa tidur nyenyak!
FROM SURVIVING TO THRIVING! 💪
Next step:
1. ACKNOWLEDGE the reality (done ✅)
2. COMMIT to fix (do it!)
3. EXECUTE with discipline (no excuse!)
4. MONITOR progress (weekly!)
5. ACHIEVE resilience (12-18 months!)
The brutal truth hurts, but it's the ONLY path to sustainable success. 🚀
Dokumen ini dibuat: 26 Januari 2026
Data source: 28 RAB files + Financial analysis 2022-2025 + Cash flow reality check
Review & update: MONTHLY untuk cash flow tracking (non-negotiable!)
This version: HONEST & ACTIONABLE